A protester takes half in an indication to indicate help for Greenland in Copenhagen, Denmark, on Jan. 17, 2026.
Tom Little | Reuters
European states are reportedly contemplating retaliatory tariffs and broader punitive financial counter-measures in opposition to the U.S. after President Donald Trump threatened contemporary export levies, deepening a rift over Greenland.
Trump introduced Saturday that eight European international locations would face growing tariffs, beginning at 10% on Feb. 1 and rising to 25% on June 1, if a deal is just not reached permitting Washington to accumulate Greenland, the mineral-rich island which is a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark.
The proposed tariffs would goal Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the U.Okay, the Netherlands and Finland. The duties would come on high of current export tariffs to the U.S., presently standing at 10% for the U.Okay. and 15% for the EU.
Regional diplomats held an emergency assembly in Brussels on Sunday afternoon to debate their response to Trump’s risk to escalate tariffs, with France reportedly pushing for the EU to make use of its strongest financial counter-threat to the U.S., generally known as the “Anti-Coercion Instrument” (ACI).
Protesters wave Greenland flags throughout an indication beneath the slogans ‘arms off Greenland’ and ‘Greenland for Greenlanders’ in entrance of the US embassy in Copenhagen, Denmark, on January 17, 2026.
Nurphoto | Nurphoto | Getty Photos
The much-vaunted instrument is seen as a nuclear choice in relation to financial counter-measures because it might see the EU limit U.S. suppliers’ entry to the EU market, excluding them from participation in public tenders within the bloc, in addition to placing export and import restrictions on items and providers and placing potential limits on overseas direct funding within the area.
Regardless of being seen as a “huge bazooka” in opposition to Trump’s tariffs playbook, it has not been used earlier than, and regional leaders have already mentioned they need to pursue dialogue with the U.S. within the coming days to resolve the rift over Greenland.
The Monetary Occasions reported that the EU was considering imposing 93 billion euros ($108 billion) price of tariffs, in addition to contemplating using the ACI.
In the meantime, Reuters reported that the European Parliament will possible now droop its work on the EU-U.S. commerce deal struck final July. The meeting had been on account of vote on eradicating many EU import duties on U.S. items on Jan. 26-27, however that approval might now be delayed, Reuters reported.
French Finance Minister Roland Lescure mentioned Monday that the EU “have to be ready” to make use of its anti-coercion mechanism, in feedback translated by Reuters.
Whereas France is extra gung-ho concerning the ACI, Germany is among the many international locations which have tended to draw back from utilizing it earlier than.
“The important thing query to observe is whether or not the EU will attempt to hold the confrontation confined to such a extra “basic” commerce struggle, or whether or not requires a harsher line prevail,” Carsten Nickel, deputy director of Analysis at Teneo, mentioned in emailed feedback.
“Representing the latter camp, France has known as on its companions to formally invoke the EU’s so-called anti-coercion instrument … [but] different EU member states, together with Germany, will possible stay cautious.”
The explanations for this divide are multifaceted, Nickel famous, together with components resembling France historically advocating for a extra unbiased European position in continental safety, and it being much less export-dependent than different nations like Germany.
Months of wrangling forward?
European leaders have been fast to react to Trump’s shock tariff risk, with U.Okay. Prime Minister Keir Starmer commenting Saturday that “making use of tariffs on allies for pursuing the collective safety of NATO allies is totally improper,” whereas French President Emmanuel Macron described them as “unacceptable.”
Nonetheless, leaders are anticipated to make use of the World Financial Discussion board going down in Davos, Switzerland, this week, as a possibility to attempt to speak to Trump, who’s addressing the discussion board on Wednesday.
Economists warn that, very like final yr when months of wrangling came about earlier than a commerce deal was signed between the U.S. and EU, this spring will possible be dominated by equally thorny discussions over Greenland.
“My base case is that the Feb. 1 [tariffs] deadline goes to be postponed as diplomatic measures are applied,” Mohit Kumar, chief European economist at Jefferies, instructed CNBC Monday.
President Donald Trump attends a bilateral assembly with European Fee President Ursula von der Leyen through the fiftieth World Financial Discussion board (WEF) annual assembly in Davos, Switzerland, January 21, 2020.
Jonathan Ernst | Reuters
“That mentioned, I believe that is completely different from the same old TACO [Trump Always Chickens Out] commerce. For Greenland, the place for Europe could be very clear: it is not on the market, and they won’t tolerate aggression … However what Trump has proven is that he needs Greenland. I do not see how the difficulty goes to go away that quickly. So we’re taking a look at months, or probably quarters, of uncertainty over tariffs.”
“For Europe it is a destructive. Development might be decreased,” he warned, forward of what could possibly be a frantic market day for European bourses on Monday, with regional indexes wanting set to stoop on the open.
